A freight forwarder was collectively sued by more than 30 companies, and the value of the goods invo
- Author:Josie
- Source:Souair
- Release Date:2020-09-05
Recently, a case involving more than 30 companies collectively suing a freight forwarding company in Shenzhen has aroused great concern in the industry.
It is understood that between March and June this year, a freight forwarding company in Shenzhen collected a batch of anti-epidemic materials, including masks, forehead temperature guns, protective clothing, etc., as well as general goods such as furniture and electronic products. Approximately 29 containers were sent to Europe in a double tax package.
However, since May, many batches of goods have not been cleared or delivered to customers.
A freight forwarder was collectively sued by more than 30 companies, and the value of the goods involved exceeded 1 billion yuan!
There are divergent opinions on the latest trends in cargo. It is reported that the goods have always been in the country and never left the country. There is also news that the goods are temporarily left in the Czech Republic.
The shareholders of the freight forwarding company involved said that the delay in clearing the goods was mainly due to the slow customs clearance of overseas customs, and they are currently trying their best to coordinate.
Not only that, the millions of dollars in freight involved in this batch of goods have also become a mystery.
The freight forwarding company involved claimed that the company suffered a loss and had no money on the account. Foreign freight forwarders also said that they did not receive a cent. Who is lying?
Since this shipment was shipped during the most severe period of the epidemic, the value of the goods involved was relatively high, exceeding 1 billion yuan. More than 30 other freight forwarding companies have been affected. These companies have collectively sued the Shenzhen freight forwarding company.
A freight forwarder was collectively sued by more than 30 companies, and the value of the goods involved exceeded 1 billion yuan!
At present, the local police station has determined that the case is an economic dispute and will cooperate with relevant departments to investigate and collect evidence. The case is still under investigation
It is understood that between March and June this year, a freight forwarding company in Shenzhen collected a batch of anti-epidemic materials, including masks, forehead temperature guns, protective clothing, etc., as well as general goods such as furniture and electronic products. Approximately 29 containers were sent to Europe in a double tax package.
However, since May, many batches of goods have not been cleared or delivered to customers.
A freight forwarder was collectively sued by more than 30 companies, and the value of the goods involved exceeded 1 billion yuan!
There are divergent opinions on the latest trends in cargo. It is reported that the goods have always been in the country and never left the country. There is also news that the goods are temporarily left in the Czech Republic.
The shareholders of the freight forwarding company involved said that the delay in clearing the goods was mainly due to the slow customs clearance of overseas customs, and they are currently trying their best to coordinate.
Not only that, the millions of dollars in freight involved in this batch of goods have also become a mystery.
The freight forwarding company involved claimed that the company suffered a loss and had no money on the account. Foreign freight forwarders also said that they did not receive a cent. Who is lying?
Since this shipment was shipped during the most severe period of the epidemic, the value of the goods involved was relatively high, exceeding 1 billion yuan. More than 30 other freight forwarding companies have been affected. These companies have collectively sued the Shenzhen freight forwarding company.
A freight forwarder was collectively sued by more than 30 companies, and the value of the goods involved exceeded 1 billion yuan!
At present, the local police station has determined that the case is an economic dispute and will cooperate with relevant departments to investigate and collect evidence. The case is still under investigation