Shenzhen invested 200 million yuan to promote green shipping
- Author:Ricky
- Release Date:2014-11-21
Recently, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China green shipping held a press conference, issued a "Shenzhen ports, ships and marine shore power facilities, low sulfur oil subsidy funds Interim Measures," the Shenzhen municipal government (hereinafter referred to as "subsidies"). Use shore power or low-sulfur oil usually carried out during the construction of shore power facilities and provide shore power for use in the administrative area of the port of Shenzhen enterprises or berthing shipping companies can apply for subsidies in accordance with the relevant "subsidy approach" requirement. Release and implementation of this approach will effectively promote the Shenzhen port ship air pollution.
Shenzhen is the world's third largest container port, discharge port and the ship had already become an important source of air pollution in Shenzhen. In order to make the ship air pollution has been effectively controlled, Europe and America, the Hong Kong experience, Shenzhen decided to take government subsidies, corporate voluntary model to promote the use of shore power and low-sulfur oil. The model encourages the ship docked using the "shore power" During his stay in Shenzhen, which docked ship power transmission through the port to maintain the operation, no access to electricity by the ship's own fuel power generation system, greatly reducing the emissions of pollutants, encourage the use of low-sulfur oil ship docked in order to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions during the Shenzhen Port. According to reports, the Shenzhen annual budget will invest 200 million yuan on the use of shore power and low-sulfur oil company subsidies, shore power facilities where the conduct is used during construction and provide berthing port enterprises or shore power used in the administrative area of Shenzhen shore power or low-sulfur oil, shipping companies can apply for subsidies in accordance with the relevant "subsidies" requirement, you can enjoy 0.7 yuan / kWh of electricity preferential tariff shore, using a sulfur content not exceeding 0.5% of low-sulfur oil and meet the requirements of the respective application shipping companies, the government will be based on the difference between the use of fuel sulfur content, which will be 75-100% difference ranging from oil subsidies.
According to the work plan to promote the progress of the expected 2016 annual Shenzhen Port shore power application ratio can reach more than 15%, berthing turn oil (sulfur content of 0.1%) proportion will reach 85%. According to estimates, will reduce annual emissions of about 6,000 tons of sulfur dioxide, sulfur dioxide emissions by the equivalent of three coal-fired power plants in Shenzhen Mawan; be about 450 tons of particulate matter emissions, while emissions of nitrogen oxides from about 2300 tons. The city is expected to make the annual average concentration of sulfur dioxide decreased about 1.2 micrograms / cubic meter, down PM2.5 annual average concentration of about 0.9 micrograms / cubic meter, the average annual concentration of nitrogen oxides decreased about 0.5 micrograms / cubic meter. This will further improve the air quality of the environment, Shenzhen play a big role. Shenzhen citizens to be able to breathe cleaner air, not only to respond positively to all incoming municipal government subsidy policies to promote the development of green shipping and green shipping spontaneously proposed development initiatives, mainly from Shekou Container Terminals Limited launched the "Green Declaration of shipping Shenzhen "to get a positive response from the industry's enterprises, most have signed up to the declaration.
According to Hong Kong official said that Hong Kong intends to legislate in 2015 emissions of the ship, but before this is the way to go voluntarily. This includes a number of other cities in Europe and the city is also taking this road, air pollution still need from voluntary to mandatory another process. Shenzhen people RC relevant leaders also said that we, to improve air quality through government subsidies is certainly not the best way, but there is a more effective it can be said the most effective way from the legislative, technical level.